JOEL “JJ” HUNTER: WARRIOR
JOEL “JJ” HUNTER: WARRIOR
Son of the man who killed Marlie’s father, a proclaimed traitor.
Married and divorced a woman (another secret agent) who was as touch and driven as Joel. But once he meets Marlie, he’s a “convert to love. One of the faithful now. A skeptic no more.”
THE LOOK:
Five o’clock shadow. Angular jaw. “[H]is hooded eyes were an intriguing shade of blue-gray-green, like the
LEADING LADY:
Marlie is an intriguing combination of shyness and insecurity, but she’s also got a kick-butt, brave, adventurous side, and isn’t afraid to make Joel question his values and beliefs. She’s able to make Joel realize that his need to be strong is an illusion and gives him a sense of purpose.
Blending Tender with Torrid
Like Marlie herself, so many of Lori Wilde’s scenes show that Joel is a man with many layers. He’s the man scarred from his father’s failure to fight for him, leaving him in the custody of his mother and some abusive stepfathers. He’s a man who doesn’t back down from conflict and who’s turned on by verbal sparring and adventure. He’s hot and sexual, but tender and insecure as well when something matters to him, like when he nudges Marlie away from her black and white clothes and into a feminine dress of green and pink.
“She didn’t know what to say. No man had ever bought her a dress before.
‘Do you like it?’ He sounded anxious, eager for her approval. His nervousness was as touching as the gift. “If you don’t like it, I’ll take it back, get you another.”
‘Joel.’ She breathed.
Dazzled, she raised her head. She couldn’t have been more moved if he’d given her diamonds or rubies.
‘You needed something clean to wear. Is it too fancy? It’s too fancy.” He answered his own question. ‘I knew I should have gotten you jeans and a T-shirt.”
“No, no.” She blinked against the mist of happy tears pushing against her eyelids. ‘It’s perfect.’
He was at his most alluring: dark eyes filled with anticipation, his mouth quirked up at one corner, warm, inviting, sexy.
And she was at her most suggestible. In a flash of sudden knowledge that almost knocked the breath out of her body. She recognized she was in love with him.
Deeply and irrevocably in love.”
QUESTION OF THE DAY:
Everyone loves a good hero, but what do readers, agents, editors, and writers love most? Join us as we delve under the covers and find out!

March 18th, 2008 at 7:01 am
I can take a little cruelty as long as there is some serious and deep realization that he was wrong and he makes up for it. But if it’ too cruel, then it’s hard for me to feel any redemption for him. There’s a part of me that believes no matter how many bad things happened to a person, if they are truly good in their heart, they won’t be cruel to others. They woudn’t have the capacity for it because they knew how it felt themselves.
March 18th, 2008 at 7:03 am
Gosh, I hope that made since with all the typos and bad grammar. That was an early morning, still dark outside, pre-coffee, just out of the bed answer
March 18th, 2008 at 9:18 am
He not only has to have a spectacular reason, realize he was wrong, admit it, and atone for it—he has to feel really, really BAD during or very shortly after doing it to keep me sympathetic to his plight. The old “her shattered expression made him wish he could take the words back” shtick. Even if he doesn’t immediately try to make it right with her, I want him aware enough of her feelings to know he hurt them and to regret doing so.
I also have a low threshold for repeat offenders, but the “feel really, really BAD” requirement usually prevents that.
March 18th, 2008 at 10:16 am
Lone and Kerry–I totally agree that the internal realization/guilt is an important factor. It’s almost like he has to feel just as bad, if not worse, than the heroine. On some level, she has to know he’s not just cruel, but hurting or scared. The whole push/pull is what balances things, keeps us on the edge, but never tips us too far to one side so we say, “Come on! Enough already!”
March 18th, 2008 at 6:58 pm
The tortured, cruel hero isn’t my favorite type. I don’t like the abuse/mistreatment, even if he does feel really bad about it afterward. I think that comes from too many people in my life whose behavior is excused just because they’re who they are. There isn’t an excuse, and so I don’t like it carried over into my fiction. Now if he’s tortured and that torture manifests in some way other than cruelty toward the heroine, then that’s a different story.
Lori Wilde rocks!
March 18th, 2008 at 10:35 pm
Misa, abuse is definitely a no for me, but I guess mistreatment comes in different shades. In fiction, I’m more open-minded, as long as the offending hero suffers a whole heck of a lot too. Lori’s awesome!
April 6th, 2008 at 1:51 pm
Blah-blah-blah. I don